Legal Opinion

J. Zimmern's Co. v. Granade

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 20, 1924No. 1 Div. 299PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff (appellant), a partnership, brought this suit against defendant stating its cause of action in two counts: (li 'The common count for money due by account. ’(2) Special assumpsit based on correspondence between the parties as follows: “On March 6, 1916,” it is alleged, “the plaintiffs wrote to defendant and stated that they did ■not care to make sales to the Chatom Mill •Company, unless the defendant would personally guarantee the account; that in reply to said letter said James N. Granade wrote-to plaintiffs stating that he would he personally responsible for the accounts of the ■…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Comer v. BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Sanford v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Clark v. Jones & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Monovis, Inc. v. AquinoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
  3. Martin v. Consolidated Cone Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Edwards v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Toles v. Cook Sons Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API