J. Zimmern's Co. v. Granade
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Plaintiff (appellant), a partnership, brought this suit against defendant stating its cause of action in two counts: (li 'The common count for money due by account. ’(2) Special assumpsit based on correspondence between the parties as follows: “On March 6, 1916,” it is alleged, “the plaintiffs wrote to defendant and stated that they did ■not care to make sales to the Chatom Mill •Company, unless the defendant would personally guarantee the account; that in reply to said letter said James N. Granade wrote-to plaintiffs stating that he would he personally responsible for the accounts of the ■…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Comer v. BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Sanford v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Clark v. Jones & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Monovis, Inc. v. AquinoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Martin v. Consolidated Cone Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Edwards v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Toles v. Cook Sons Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.