Julie Research Laboratories, Inc. v. General Resistance, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, entered September 22, 1965, unanimously modified, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant, to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action; and complaint dismissed, with taxable costs. The complaint, which alleges that plaintiff is a manufacturer and seller of voltage dividers and other electrical and precision instruments, states no cause of action on the basis of the advertisement by the defendant, a competitor, that its primary voltage divider is the “World’s Most Accurate Volt-Ratio Divider”. Although it is alleged that defendant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Smith-Victor Corporation v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Frawley Chemical Corp. v. A. P. Larson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brignoli v. Balch Hardy and Scheinman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Chandris America Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Elite Brands, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gen. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006