Legal Opinion
State v. McConville
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 19, 2004No. 52266-3-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 P.3d 401 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
James J. McCONVILLE, Appellant.
No. 52266-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 19, 2004.
Corbin T. Volluz, Attorney At Law, Mount Vernon, WA, for Appellant.
Erik Pedersen, Mount Vernon, WA, for Respondent.
AGID, J.
James McConville appeals his conviction of one count of first degree theft. He argues that the State lacked sufficient evidence, independent of his confessions, to prove the corpus delicti of the crime charged. The trial court rejected this claim because the corpus delicti rule governs whether confessions are admissible…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. ArbogastWashington Supreme Court · 2022
- State Of Washington v. Christopher Gabriel MathewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.