Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1906No. 5080; No. 2646 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Weld County. Eon. Christian A. Bennett, Judge. Action by J. S.. Morgan against H. J. Perkins and Mary M. Perkins. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant, Mary M. Perkins, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxw-ell

Action against H. J. and Mary M. Perkins for balance ,due upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff, to defendant H. J. Perkins at his request, on and between January 29, 1891, and November 20, 1893^

The answer of defendant Mary M. Perkins, and plaintiff’s reply thereto, presented this question:

What portion of the goods sold and delivered were for expenses of the family?

The defendant H. J. did not answer. This allegation of the amended complaint was admitted:

‘ ‘ That the defendants, H. J. and Mary M. Perkins, are and were husband and wife living together…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cuenin v. HalbouerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Adams v. TuckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Blakely v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. Pippin v. Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Straight v. McKayColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hasegawa v. DayColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In Re the Marriage of EisenhuthColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Houck v. La Junta Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API