Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Schroeder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1982No. 44401PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

This appeal (which comes to us in a form and posture bearing little, if any, relationship to our prescribed procedural scheme) seeks to reverse an order directing defendant-appellant, J. H. Schroeder, to produce certain documents pursuant to the Attorney General’s civil investigative demand. We reverse and remand.

It appears that after appellant failed to produce the documents sought, the Attorney General filed an amended petition under the provisions of the Ne braska Consumer Protection Act, seeking judicial enforcement ri his demand. Thereafter, appellant filed an answer which, among other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hiram Scott College v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fisk v. ThorpNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sterling Manufacturing Co. v. HoughNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Tuch v. TuchNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Domann v. DomannNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Black v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Howard v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Benton v. BD. OF EDUC. OF SCHOOL DIST. NO. 17Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API