Legal Opinion

Fisk v. Thorp

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1897No. 7171PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Bartow, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

On the 10th day of February, 1892, the plaintiff in error herein commenced two actions in the district court of Sioux county, each for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage and judgment against certain of the parties for any of the amount of debt unsatisfied by the application of the proceeds of the sale of the lands under the mortgage. The actions proceeded to decrees of sale of the mortgaged premises, confirmations of the sales, and deficiency judgments were rendered against certain of the defendants therein, including Russell Thorp and Josephine C. Thorp, defendants in error herein.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sterling Manufacturing Co. v. HoughNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. BurnsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. State v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Stevens v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API