Legal Opinion

State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Baun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1975No. 56119, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. S. Coleman, J.

Three viable questions are *33presented by this appeal from a decision of the State Bar Grievance Board.(1) Was appellant Baun denied due process in that the procedures under which the Bar Grievance Board operate are inherently biased?(2) After having been advised that the respondent intended to claim his Fifth Amendment privilege, was it error for the State Bar to request that respondent take the stand under State Bar Rule 16, § 16.11?

(Conversely, the Bar Grievance Administrator has cross-appealed to inquire whether the Board erred when it ruled against any cross-examination under § 16.11.)1(3)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. GilletteMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. MoesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Bar of Michigan v. BlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In the Matter of MikesellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Miss. State Bar v. ATTORNEY-RESPONDENT, ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API