Legal Opinion
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 31, 1992No. C0-92-540PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
We granted the petition of the commissioner of public safety for review of the court of appeals’ decision in this cáse in order to resolve a conflict between decisions by different panels concerning the scope of the limited right to counsel recognized in Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 473 N.W.2d 828 (Minn.1991).
The issue is whether the fact that the limited right to counsel recognized in Friedman is based on the state constitution rather than on statute means that State, Department of Public Safety v. Held, 311 Minn. 74, 246 N.W.2d 863 (1976), is no longer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Campbell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Eriksmoen v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KarauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.