Legal Opinion
Cogswell v. Rodriquez
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 24, 2004No. 2:02-cv-04281PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion by the defendant State of New York Hearing Examiner William Rodriquez, Esq. (“Rodriquez”) to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”). In the alternative, Rodriquez moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Fed.R.Civ.P.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On July 30, 2002, Rita Anne Cogswell (“Cogswell” or the “plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, commenced this action against Suffolk County, Hearing…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ademiluyi v. AlbrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Ademiluyi v. AlbrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Commissioner of Social Services, as Designee for H. Venture, Interstate Child Support Investigator o/b/o Sasha G. Hendricks v. Dujohn P. HendricksDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Deleon v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Gerken v. GordonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.