Legal Opinion
Haynoski v. Haynoski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 20, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
264 N.J. Super. 408 (1993)
624 A.2d 1030
BENJAMIN HAYNOSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A SHAREHOLDER ON BEHALF OF JERSEY STEEL RULE DIE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LEONARD HAYNOSKI, SR., LEONARD HAYNOSKI, JR. AND CATHERINE HAYNOSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND JERSEY STEEL RULE DIE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 8, 1993.
Decided May 20, 1993.
Before Judges PETRELLA, D'ANNUNZIO and KEEFE.
Marilyn Van Houten argued the cause for appellant, (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys, Robert G. Rose, on the brief and Joseph Lunin,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Winer Motors, Inc. v. Jaguar Rover Triumph, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laidlaw, Inc. v. Student Transportation of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Salvadori v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Stanton v. RICH BAKER BERMAN & CO., PADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Blitz v. Florida Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Lewin v. LongDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.