Baer v. Durham Duplex Razor Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.
The plaintiff has recovered judgment in an action for the breach of an alleged contract by which the defendant agreed to market a razor invented and patented by the plaintiff, to pay the plaintiff one cent per razor royalty thereon, with the understanding that the minimum royalties paid would be on the basis of 200,000 razors a year. The defendant challenges the existence of any contract at all. Plaintiff’s reliance in this respect is upon an exchange of correspondence. On October 27, 1925, the defendant wrote a letter, which was signed by the plaintiff as well, in which the defendant stated,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Kelly v. . Security Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Nichols v. Scranton Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bauchle v. BauchleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spitz v. LesserNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Sulyok v. Penzintezeti Kozpont BudapestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Cole v. MackloweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hall v. Nassau Consumers Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Passaic Distributors, Inc. v. Sherman CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.