United States v. Mead

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of nine specifications of possessing child pornography (still images and videos), in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 9 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-l.

On appeal, the appellant asserts three errors:

I. WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY AND FACTUALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN APPELLANT’S CONVICTION FOR THE CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS WHERE THE GOVERNMENT FAILED TO PROVE…