Legal Opinion
Deyo v. Adams
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1944Published
1Opinion of the CourtGarvin, J.
Defendant May Adams moves for an order granting her leave to serve a supplemental answer and for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Defendant Harry Adams moves for summary judgment pursuant to the same rule, on the ground that the action has no merit.
The complaint herein has been sustained. (See Deyo v. Adams, 178 Misc. 859.) As a result of that decision the Legislature enacted section 24 of the Personal Property Law, •effective April 19, 1943.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In re the Estate of DeyoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Deyo v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Endurance Holding Corp. v. Kramer Surgical Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Henry v. New York Post, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.