Legal Opinion

Solberg v. TICE ELECTRIC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 2, 2007No. 03-00534 to 03-00540 and A129565PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing an order of an administrative law judge (ALJ) and upholding employer’s denial of claimant’s occupational disease claim for an employment-related condition known as “pleural plaques.” We affirm the board’s order holding that claimant has not established an occupational disease.

The facts are undisputed. Claimant has noncompensable, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, related to cigarette smoking. Because a chest x-ray showed pleural plaques, an asbestos-related condition, claimant was referred to Dr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. WodaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. K-MART v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AK Steel Corp. v. PollittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  2. AK Steel Corp. v. PollittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API