Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2009No. Nos. C-070560 and C-070571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Clarence Ford was arrested on drug and weapons charges. Due to a variety of circumstances, his trial was delayed. The trial court dismissed the drug charges because the trial did not take place within the speedy-trial period. But the court tried Ford on the gun charge — he was found guilty and was sentenced to four years in prison. Both Ford and the state now appeal.

{¶ 2} Because the state failed to prosecute both the drug and the weapons charges within 90 days of Ford’s arrest (excluding all time that was not charged against the state), all charges against Ford…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Zaken, 2006-A-0036 (5-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Peek, 06ca0054 (6-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KnottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. VotawOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API