Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2002No. 2001-1686 & 2001-1688PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121,

2002-Ohio-7040.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BROWN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121,

2002-Ohio-7040.] Criminal law — Speedy-trial statute — Demand for discovery or bill of particulars is tolling event pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(E). (Nos. 2001-1686 and 2001-1688 — Submitted September 17, 2002 — Decided December 23, 2002.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Fayette County, No. CA2000-10-027. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A demand for discovery or a bill of particulars is a tolling event pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. PilgrimOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. RileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. DankworthOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. GartrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API