Legal Opinion

United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2010No. 05-10067, 05-15006, 05-55354PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.

ORDER

The revised opinion filed concurrently herewith shall constitute the final action of the court. No petitions for rehearing will be considered.

2Per curiam

OPINION

This case is about a federal investigation into steroid use by professional baseball players. More generally, however, it’s about the procedures and safeguards that federal courts must observe in issuing and administering search warrants and sub*1166poenas…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by97 opinions

  1. In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. StabileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. GalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API