United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
ORDER
The revised opinion filed concurrently herewith shall constitute the final action of the court. No petitions for rehearing will be considered.
2Per curiam
OPINION
This case is about a federal investigation into steroid use by professional baseball players. More generally, however, it’s about the procedures and safeguards that federal courts must observe in issuing and administering search warrants and sub*1166poenas…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by97 opinions
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. StabileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.