Legal Opinion
Arnold v. White House
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-1695Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 1695 (LLA) WHITE HOUSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In June 2025, the court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff Marie Encar Arnold’s pro se complaint for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), but the court permitted Ms. Arnold to file an amended complaint within thirty days. ECF Nos. 3, 4. Ms. Arnold timely filed an amended complaint, ECF No. 6, but the court will dismiss it because it suffers from the same Rule 8(a) defects as her initial complaint.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Jiggetts v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.