Wilken v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
We first remand for housekeeping corrections; namely, to have the forms used by the trial court accurately reflect appellant did not plead nolo contendere, but was found guilty by a jury of Count III of the information; to strike any references to community control as to Count III; and to strike reference to assessment of costs, as they were not assessed.
Substantively, we remand for resentenc-ing because we agree with appellant’s counsel that his client does not meet the statutory requirements for habitual misde-meanant. Section 775.084(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Shead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Snowden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- State v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Lovett v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Mitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991