State v. Snowden
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
476 So.2d 191 (1985)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
James Michael SNOWDEN, Respondent.
No. 65176.
Supreme Court of Florida.
August 29, 1985.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Mark C. Menser and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for respondent.
SHAW, Justice.
We granted the petition to review Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), because of conflict with Hawkins v. State, 436 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1983). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Snowden was charged with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- State v. EnmundSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Snowden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.