Legal Opinion

L.M.W. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 30, 1994No. 2-93-401-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*757OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Appellant, L.M.W., was convicted by a jury of the offense of indecency with a child by contact. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon 1994). The jury assessed punishment at confinement for three years, probated for eight years. In four points of error, appellant challenges the conviction contending the trial court erred in: 1) denying a motion for instructed verdict; 2) denying the right to introduce impeachment evidence; 3) denying the right to introduce evidence showing “illegal settlement negotiations;” and 4) refusing to permit testimony as to the meaning of the term…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rankin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Madry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. Osteen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. Jeffery Lynn Pruett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Anthony Eugene Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API