L.M.W. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*757OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
Appellant, L.M.W., was convicted by a jury of the offense of indecency with a child by contact. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon 1994). The jury assessed punishment at confinement for three years, probated for eight years. In four points of error, appellant challenges the conviction contending the trial court erred in: 1) denying a motion for instructed verdict; 2) denying the right to introduce impeachment evidence; 3) denying the right to introduce evidence showing “illegal settlement negotiations;” and 4) refusing to permit testimony as to the meaning of the term…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Madry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Osteen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Jeffery Lynn Pruett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Anthony Eugene Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.