Echols v. OMNI MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. #23) and defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. (Dkt. # 29). The court denies the request to file a supplemental brief because additional briefing is unnecessary, and concludes that defendant OMNI Medical Group (“OMNI”) should not be severed to perfect diversity jurisdiction. Because OMNI remains part of the suit, there is not complete diversity between the parties, and the case must be remanded.
I. BACKGROUND
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Oppenheim v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
- Joseph v. Baxter International Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hampton v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- Carden v. KLUCZNIKDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Gary Family Trust, The v. GaryDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Nyman v. Mid-Century InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Welborn v. Ethicon Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.