Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tuscaloosa County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1988No. 86-1653PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the petitioner's request to review the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that the "failure to file suit within the time specified by the applicable statute of limitations bars the injured employee's right to sue not only for [workmen's] compensation but also for [accrued medical expenses]."1 The Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the insurer's summary judgment, reasoned as follows:

"Section 25-5-1(1), Code 1975, expressly provides that `medical and surgical treatment and attention, medicine, medical and surgical supplies, crutches and apparatus furnished an employee' do not constitute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Morgan v. Rheem Mfg. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. McLain v. GAF Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Stewart v. Carter Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Tuscaloosa County v. Ina/Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. O'NEALCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Robert Burton & Associates, Ltd. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Dueitt v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ex Parte Americold Compressors Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Robert Burton & Associates, Ltd. v. MorrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API