Legal Opinion

Scott v. Albord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), dated March 21, 2001, as granted his motion to compel disclosure of the injured plaintiffs no-fault records only to the extent of compelling disclosure of the records concerning “the history of the occurrence of the accident,” and conditionally granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to strike his answer unless he appeared for an examination before trial on a certain date.

Ordered that the order is modified by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Torres v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Hinrichs v. TonnssenNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beutel v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Vinings Spinal Diagnostic v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2006
  3. Cajamarca v. OsatukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API