Frank v. Wolf
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on foreign judgment; from city court of Savannah— Judge Davis Freeman. February 11, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. Under the facts disclosed by the record, and under the agreed statement as to what is the law of the State of Pennsylvania upon the question at issue, the judgment rendered in that State never became dormant, and therefore could not be legally revived, and, consequently, the action in the city court of Savannah, based upon that judgment and brought more than thirteen years, after the date of the judgment, was barred by the statute of limitations, as set forth in section 4354 of the Civil Code of Georgia; and the court did not err in so holding, and in rendering judgment for the defendant.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kirk v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watkins v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Albert v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Durden v. DurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Masters v. ESR CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Baty v. HolstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.