Legal Opinion

School Town of Winamac v. Hess

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1898No. 18,307PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant sued the appellees Hess and Myers as principals, and Gilmore and Cor-bin as sureties, on a bond executed by them to appellant on May 26, 1892, conditioned that Hess and Myers should, as contractors, construct a school building in the town of Winamac for $16,896.60, in all respects according to and in compliance with the terms, stipulations, and specifications of a contract executed by them on the same day to appellant. The defendants Hess and Myers, filed a cross-copaplaint, seeking to recover a judgment against the plaintiff. A trial of the issues resulted in a special finding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Daviess County v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. City of Laporte v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McGillivray v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Herman v. City of OcontoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jordan v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Caldwell v. BauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API