King v. Cartlidge

OPINION

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment because appellant failed to file an opposition within the deadline *927set by Rule 13(3) of the District Court Rules (DCR) and did not set forth any evidence showing a genuine issue for trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and thus affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Blaine Cartlidge sued Maria Marsano in January 2000 for breach of a contract hen. Marsano was represented by appellant Carter King. King was later named as a codefendant in the…