Legal Opinion

Windom v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1997No. 01-94-00866-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of robbery. The trial judge found two enhancement para*268graphs alleging prior aggravated robberies to be true and assessed punishment of life in prison. We must decide whether the court had power to try appellant for aggravated robbery after granting a new trial following appellant’s earlier conviction for the lesser included offense of robbery.

Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery, but the State reduced the charge to robbery in exchange for his plea of no contest and an agreed 40-year sentence. For reasons not shown on the record, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Morris v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ex Parte McAfeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Windom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. David Mark Temple v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Gregory Carl Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API