Legal Opinion
State v. Suter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1984No. C2-83-1374PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Charles Suter was charged with killing an antlerless deer in violation of Minn.Stat. § 97.48, subd. 1, and Commissioner’s Order No. 2125, section 13(e). The charge is a misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 97.55, subd. 1. The appellant waived his right to a jury trial. Instead, both parties submitted the matter to the trial court on stipulated facts. The trial court found the defendant acted intentionally in firing his gun in the direction of the deer, and therefore, guilty of violating the Commissioner’s Order. The trial court imposed a fine of $100 together with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. OsterlohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. KremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BjornsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DolsbyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. SuterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984