Legal Opinion

W.F.W. v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1989No. 16114PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN C. HOLSTEIN, Special Judge.

Movant W.F.W. was convicted on two counts for having raped his twelve-year old daughter. § 566.030.3, RSMo Supp.1984. He was sentenced, as a persistent offender, to two thirty-year sentences to run concurrently. § 558.016.6(2), RSMo Supp.1984. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. W.F.W., 721 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App.1986).

On February 4, 1988, movant filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15.1 After counsel was appointed, an amended motion was filed. Twenty-one grounds for relief were scattered through ten numbered paragraphs. Two of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. W_F. WMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Weekly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Barry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Harry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API