Legal Opinion

Scandiamant Aktiebolag v. Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 12, 1974No. 73--1396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Senior District Judge:

Inventors Olle Lindstrom and Erik Lundblad filed an application for a patent on a method for preparing diamonds for use with grinding wheels. The claimed invention is the alleged discovery that the use of diamonds coated with metal in a prescribed thickness range in a resin bonded grinding wheel will improve the grinding results, i. e., the measure of grinding efficiency of the wheel, by as much as 200% to 300%. The thickness range for this metal coating is between 0.5 and 25 microns.

The Patent Office rejected the application, and the Board of Appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  2. Milliken Research Corp. v. Dan River, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1982
  3. Robintech, Inc. v. Chemidus Wavin, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  4. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  5. Honeywell, Inc. v. DiamondDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API