Legal Opinion

In re Bollman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1920No. 10,762PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified questions of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Hannah Bollman against Harve Lewellen. Certified questions by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, P. J.

The Industrial Board has certified to this court questions of law based upon the following facts: One Lewellen, a resident of Montgomery county, owned a threshing outfit which he had operated in his community for more than ten years immediately prior to July 16, 1919. During all of said time Lewellen had in his employ as engineer one Bollman, whose duty it *47was to operate the engine used in propelling the machinery and in moving the same from farm to farm. Late in the evening on July 16, 1919, Lewellen moved his threshing machinery onto the farm of one Downey for the purpose of threshing wheat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Moyse v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Granite Sand & Gravel Co. v. WilloughbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Conklin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API