Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clarke v. Omaha & Southwestern Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1877Published

This was a motion for a rehearing of the cause argued at the January Term, A. D. 1876, and reported in 4 Neb., 458.

1DissentMaxwell, J.

If we admit, for argument’s sake, that the original contract for the sale of the plaintiff’s railroad lines to the defendant is against public policy and will not be specifically enforced by a court of equity, still he is entitled to relief. On the 31st day of December, 1869, the plaintiff subscribed for two hundred shares of stock in his own and others’ names. The articles subscribed contained a provision that the stock so subscribed should be paid for in money. Whatever may have been the object of this provision no one will contend that it could not be waived by the parties. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Stevens v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  3. Clarke v. Omaha & Southwestern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API