Legal Opinion

S.M. v. Lakeland School District

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 2002No. 01-3006UnknownCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of an eleven-year old fifth grade student alleging violations of the substantive component of the Due Process Clause by her teacher, Anthony Cerra, the school district, and the superintendent. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. S.M. v. The Lakeland Sch. Dist., 148 F.Supp.2d 542 (M.D.Pa.2001). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm.

We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. In so doing, we must view the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Rhonda Gottlieb, by and Through Her Guardian and Parent, Mary Calabria v. Laurel Highlands School District Michael CarbonaraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local 19 v. Herre Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. S.M. v. Lakeland School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. K.A. v. Abington Heights School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Bridges ex rel. D.B. v. Scranton School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. L.H. v. Pittston Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Vaher v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Roe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API