Legal Opinion
Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Town of Penfield, NY
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1996No. 6:96-cv-06125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
Payless ShoeSouree, Inc. (“plaintiff’) brings this action, pursuant to § 1121(b) of the Lanham Act, against the Town of Pen-field (“Town”), the Penfield Zoning Board of Appeals (“Board”), and Town Building Inspector Harold Morehouse (“Morehouse”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging unlawful interference with its trademark.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, who operates two retail stores in Penfield, has a trademark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. This mark consists of the distinctively lettered name “Payless ShoeSouree”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Philanz Oldsmobile, Inc. v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lisa's Party City, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Lisa's Party City, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City Of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.