Legal Opinion

Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City Of Tempe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1998No. 97-15535Published

1Opinion of the Court

141 F.3d 1295

46 U.S.P.Q.2d 1437, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2757,

98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3811

BLOCKBUSTER VIDEOS, INC., a Texas corporation; Video

Update, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF TEMPE, a municipal subdivision of the State of

Arizona, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-15535.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1997.

Decided April 15, 1998.

Clifford L. Mattice and David Merkel, Office of the City Attorney, Tempe, AZ, for defendant-appellant.

David K. Jones, Phoenix, Arizona, and Marcia B. Paul, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API