Legal Opinion

Carrol Richard Olson v. David R. McKune and Robert Stephan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1993No. 93-3144PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Carrol Richard Olson, appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habe-as corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies for nine of the more than twenty claims. On appeal, petitioner argues that all claims raised in the petition have been exhausted in state court. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1

“[A] state prisoner bringing a federal ha-beas corpus action bears the burden of showing that he has exhausted available state remedies_”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Larry Charles Clonce v. Rex Presley, U. S. Marshal, and the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. BiltortDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  2. Antalek v. Kansas, State ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  3. Bloom v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Brown v. State of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Candelaria v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API