Legal Opinion
Larry Charles Clonce v. Rex Presley, U. S. Marshal, and the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1981No. 79-2049PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Larry Charles Clonce appeals the dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. While on mandatory release and subject to federal parole for bank burglary and voluntary manslaughter, petitioner was convicted in an Oklahoma state court of grand larceny and sentenced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lloyd Stevenson Bond v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Selsor v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hamm v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. BruntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.