Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Librun v. Griffis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2002No. 1D00-4277Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrowning, J.

I agree with the majority to the extent that, if dismissal was warranted, it should have been without prejudice. See Wright v. Allen, 611 So.2d 23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). However, I dissent from the majority opinion because, in my judgment, the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing Appellant’s motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant alleged that Appellees, for years, consistently denied Appellant access to pens, paper, and his legal materials. Appellant’s allegations are supported by a plethora of requests to Appellees to provide these materials, and Appellees’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frohman v. Bar-OrSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Wright v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Lakeside Regent, Inc. v. Cohen, Scherer & Cohn, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Torres v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API