Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Power Systems Division

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1476 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal by Power Systems Division, McGraw Edison, from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision awarding compensation to Rhodi Chandler. The issue is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the referee’s adjudication. We conclude there is and, therefore, affirm.

Chandler filed his claim petition on November 25, 1968, alleging that he had injured his back in a work-related accident on July 10, 1968. Following a series of hearings, a referee denied compensation in a decision dated September…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. David v. BELLEVUE LOCUST GARAGECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. SimonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Rosenau Bros. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Mauchly Associates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Remmey Div., A. P. Green Refractories Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. 4156 Bar Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Mikalonis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Philco Ford Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API