Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Philco Ford Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1976No. Appeal, No. 476 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

William Spear (claimant) was employed as a millwright in the maintenance division of the Philco Ford Corporation (employer) for a period of 30 years. His duties were physically demanding, often requiring the movement of heavy items of various types. On March 21, 1973, while moving a metal desk on a dolly in the course of his employment, Spear sustained a disabling back injury (1973 injury). After a period of absence from work necessitated by the injury, the claimant was examined by a company physician who ordered him to do less strenuous labor. The employer transferred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Sherred v. PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Mikalonis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Power Systems DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Tady v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. RCA Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Romanski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Huddleson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API