Legal Opinion
In re Petal
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 25, 2008No. 2007-B-1299PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1139| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Malcolm R. Petal, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Garland Key was employed by the United States Marine Forces Reserve as a program analyst. In January 2001, Mr. Key filed an Equal Employment Opportunity complaint against his employer, contending that he was discriminated against based on his age and mental impairment when his request for certain employment-related accommodations…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Carl Selenberg v. Dianne BatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In Re PetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- In re SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008