Zorn v. Smith
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Dooley, J.,
¶ 29. dissenting. No lawyer in the State of Vermont has the obligation to ensure that this plaintiff, or any other person, obtains access to the courts for purposes of presenting a meritorious or arguably meritorious case. Lawyers are private actors who extend, or refuse to extend, legal services based on many considerations, including economic reward and ability to get along with the client. Even lawyers in publicly-funded agencies created to extend legal services to the indigent have the ability to refuse to accept prospective clients for reasons not based on the merits of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Anne M. Pavilonis v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.