Legal Opinion

Dickun v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1932No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellants operate a two-track trolley system on the north side of Duquesne Boulevard in Kenmore, a sparsely built suburban district of the City of Pittsburgh. The deceased, in an effort to board one of its trolley cars, crossed Duquesne Boulevard to a brick paved platform for passengers on the south side of the tracks, and then proceeded to cross the two tracks to a similar platform on the north side. These platforms were used by passengers to board or alight from cars. She had proceeded but a few steps on the second track, on which the car was running, when she…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klingensmith v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. HAMLEY v. PITTSBURGH RWYS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Downey v. Union Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Siegfried v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Brungo v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Kissinger v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API