Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mott

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 21, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woodin, S.

This is a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the accounts of the sole surviving executor of the above-named deceased. The decedent’s will was admitted to probate in this *100court June 28, 1929. The will is dated December 5, 1895, and at the time it was executed the decedent had seven brothers and sisters living. The dispositive portion of the will reads as follows:

“ Second. I give to Edmund C. Mott one thousand dollars $1000. “ I give to Julia S. Hoyt, eight hundred dollars $800.
“ I give to Marion Landphire, eight hundred dollars $800.
“ I give the use of one thousand dollars to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Barnes v. HusonNew York Supreme Court · 1871
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of DepeirrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steidl v. FreygangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of HorvathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. Hoverstad v. First National Bank and Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In re the Estate of O'NeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API