Legal Opinion

Wright v. Barclay

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1949No. 32510PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

Elizabeth Wright and Roland Pruess commenced this action in the district court for Cass County against Earl Barclay, E. P. Stewart, and Nyle C. Stewart. The purpose of the action is to obtain the specific performance of a provision in a lease which plaintiffs claim gives them an option to purchase certain real property. From a decree in favor of the plaintiffs the defendants have appealed.

For the purpose of this opinion the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court or by their proper names.

While the record discloses considerable conflict in the evidence on immaterial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Frank v. Stratford-HandcockWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Myers v. J. J. Stone & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Andreula v. Slovak Gymnastic Union Sokol Assembly No. 223Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Ahmed v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Master Laboratories, Inc. v. ChesnutNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Securities Co. v. DaringerNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API