Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Fashion Ribbon Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided March 10, 1969No. A.R.D. 252; Entry No. IAD 547234Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Rigi-iardson, Judge:

I regret that I am unable to concur in the views of the majority concerning assignment of error number 5. In my opinion there is no evidence in the record before us of “actual” general expenses and profit meeting the requirements of the constructed value theory of valuation, other than as appraised.

The only evidence in the case consists of an affidavit dated October 8, 1965, and signed by one Georges Sicard, sole owner and proprietor of Aiguilles d’Haiti, the exporter of the involved ribbon novelties. The affidavit was received in evidence upon the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Empire DistributorsUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Stirn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Stirn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API