Legal Opinion

Stirn v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 19, 1924No. 2201PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbeR, Judge

This case involves the validity of a reappraisement made by a board of three general appraisers of certain dyed thrown silk, known as “organzine.” The appeal to reappraisement was taken by the importer.

The merchandise is dutiable under paragraph 313 of the tariff act of 1913 and was imported from Lyons, France.

It is undisputed that there was no market value as defined by law for the silk in the condition in which it was imported, and that it was incumbent upon the appraising officers to ascertain its dutiable value in the manner pointed out under the first part of' paragraph L of Section III…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Stirn v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Styles for Boys, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. Control Data Corp.United States Customs Court · 1972
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Stockheimer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Charles Stockheimer Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API