Legal Opinion
BROWN v. CARSON
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 3, 2022No. S21G0857PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
313 Ga. 621
FINAL COPY S21G0857. BROWN et al v. CARSON et al. COLVIN, Justice. We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether E. Howard Carson1 acquired a vested right to develop property in a particular manner based upon alleged assurances made to him by Tom Brown, the Forsyth County Planning Director. Based on the record before this Court, we conclude that Carson did not acquire a vested right; therefore, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals to the contrary and remand the case with direction. See Carson v. Brown,
358 Ga. App. 619
( 856 SE2d 5) (2021).2 1 Carson is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- WMM Properties, Inc. v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Barker v. County of ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Cos Corp. v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Calhoun v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dawgs & Dingoes, LLC v. The City of PoolerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Tom Brown v. E. Howard Carson, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2023