Legal Opinion

Dodo v. Stocker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1923No. 10,536PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Dodo made his promissory note to the Mountain States Mixed Feed and Feedyards Company, payable in six months. The note was indorsed to Stocker for value before maturity; he brought suit and recovered judgment. The defendant brings error.

The note was given for preferred stock in the said company, with which was thrown in some common stock. Certain defenses were set up to which there was a general *97denial. Trial was to the court and there was a general finding for the plaintiff.

The propositions relied on in defense are: 1. That the evidence shows that the plaintiff acquired the note after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. President of the Bank of the United States v. LymanUnited States Circuit Court · 1848
  5. McClellan v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tate v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Moore v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Ryska v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. AyalaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. CuddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API